Publishers and Academics: Partnerships or Power
relationships?
February 19, 2006
Daniel Gile
Université Lyon 2, France
daniel.gile@laposte.net
Elsevier has
just published its 14-volume Encyclopedia
of Language and Linguistics. Just before publication, authors received a
circular mail informing them that according to “company policy”, they would
receive no off-prints or pdf files of their own
contributions. No further explanation was offered.
It is a
well-established tradition in academic publishing that authors are entitled to
off-prints of their papers. Elsevier’s “company policy” violates it blatantly. While
its reluctance to print out and post 3000 articles can be explained by the cost
involved, it is difficult to see why finalized pdf
files could not be provided to authors, especially in view of the fact that
proofs were sent to them as pdf files.
The
circular message sent just before publication and denying off-prints to
contributors shows that Elsevier is aware that this action goes against
established rules. Moreover, the Encyclopedia is sold at an introductory price
of 4480 $ or 3999 Euros, far beyond the financial reach of individual academics
and of many university libraries. Most individual contributors will not have
access to the published version of their own work. And yet, there is not even
an attempt at explaining this “company policy”.
Must and
should the academic community accept such attitudes and action from commercial
publishers? In this age of email and websites, publishers need academics more
than academics need them. Being published by prestigious houses is an asset,
but being read – and subsequently cited – is more important, and this can be
achieved without commercial publishers.
The
partnership with publishers must be based on mutual respect and mutual
interests, not on power relationships. Academics can respond to attitudes such
as Elsevier’s in several ways:
- Protesting and insisting that either an
offprint or pdf files of contributions be sent to
authors,
- Posting the pre-publication version of their
contribution on their personal website and/or academic organization’s website
and making the fact known to other scholars through electronic and other
networks (see http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq),
- Adding an “off-print clause” when signing a
contributor’s agreement with the publisher,
- Adding a clause retaining their right to
publish their contribution on the web when signing a contributor’s agreement,
- Refusing to cooperate with publishers whose
attitudes or actions are inappropriate and supporting publishers with a mindset
more in line with the spirit of scholarly writing and dissemination of
research.