Home

      European Society for Translation Studies
TwitterFacebookYou Tube

 

Statement on 2011 ERIH rankings of Translation Studies journals


The European Society for Translation Studies is concerned and dismayed by the systematic downgrading of Translation Studies journals in the 2011 lists released by the European Science Foundation.


The 2011 ERIH lists place journals in three ranks: INT1 (international with high visibility), INT2 (international with significant visibility), and NAT (of significance in a particular country)

The 2007 and 2011 ranks for Translation Studies journals are as follows:

Name of journal 2007 2011
INT2 INT2
INT2 INT2
NAT NAT
NAT NAT
INT1 INT2
INT2 INT2
NAT NAT
INT1 INT1
INT1 INT2
INT2 NAT
NAT NAT
INT1 INT1
INT2 INT2
INT1 INT2
INT1 INT1

It is difficult to understand why some journals are downgraded to or remain stuck in the 'national' category  when they have editorial boards and/or advisory boards that are international. Likewise, it is absolutely unclear why some other journals were downgraded from INT1 to INT2.

In view of this systematic lack of recognition, following its general concern for the poor ratings of Translation Studies journals, and in support of similar complaints by the Canadian Association of Translation Studies, the European Society for Translation Studies takes the following measures:

  1. We urge the European Science Foundation to establish a category for Translation Studies as a discipline, as they have done for Gender Studies, Classical Studies, and Religious Studies.  
  2. We insist that any committee evaluating Translation Studies journal include some members who are experts in Translation Studies.
  3. We urge our members not to use the ERIH lists for "bibliometric information or assessment processes of individual candidates, be it for positions, promotions, research grant awards etc." (as ERIH itself requests).

European Society for Translation Studies
June 5, 2011

Further information:

Formal letter of complaint from EST
Formal letter of complaint from AEITI
Resolution by CATS
Introduction to ERIH lists

 

Share
Copyright EST 2016. Contact webmaster

 



journals

2013 reply to this complaint

Online journals

Rankings

General statement on rankings